[SECC] RTTY

AE4Y ae4y at mindspring.com
Fri Jan 14 17:46:01 EST 2005


I thought so.  Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Kent, AE4Y



Daniel L. Jeswald wrote:

> No more so than the original RTTY CQer that fired up on top of the CW 
> guy. Which is what happens more times than not.
> 
> Dan/W4NTI
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "AE4Y" <ae4y at mindspring.com>
> To: "Daniel L. Jeswald" <w4nti at mindspring.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 4:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [SECC] RTTY
> 
> 
>> In trying to follow your logic as you look at all sides of the 
>> proposed solution, wouldn't it be safe to say that an operator who would:
>>
>> ". . . fire up on TTY and call CQ contest on top of them for a while"
>>
>> would typically be considered to be on the lid side of the equation?
>>
>> Kent, AE4Y
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel L. Jeswald wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at all sides of a solution.
>>>
>>> Dan/W4NTI
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "AE4Y" <ae4y at mindspring.com>
>>> To: "SECC" <secc at contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 3:45 PM
>>> Subject: [SECC] RTTY
>>>
>>>
>>>> > "A lid is a lid is a lid."
>>>> >
>>>> > "Another approach is to fire up on TTY and call CQ contest on top 
>>>> of > > them for a while."
>>>> >
>>>> >  Dan/W4NTI




More information about the SECC mailing list