[SECC] RTTY fastest growing

[Daniel L. Jeswald]

Don't need a quad to do well on CW.  Just need a few hundred cycles to do it 
in.  As for painting a whole group with the same brush.  True.  I'll make it 
50 percent are lids.  That better?

Oh and BTW I also run digital modes and enjoy them.

Lets be straight up with this deal,  contesters are a extremely competitive 
lot.  Which is a good thing,  for the most part...BUT they sometimes lose 
site of the fact that others are on at the same time and tend to shall we 
say....overpower the opposition?  Which is probably what goes on with the CW 
vs RTTY stuff.  BUT that does NOT excuse the RTTY crowd from stomping all 
over a CW signal....because they can.  And it happens way to many times to 
be accidental.

Dan/W4NTI

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary McConville" <wb4sq at yahoo.com>
To: "Moss, Dave J (INPO)" <MossDJ at INPO.org>; <secc at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 12:30 AM
Subject: RE: [SECC] RTTY fastest growing


> Thats right.  And besides, not everyone has a quad!
>
> Gary - WB4SQ
>
>
> --- "Moss, Dave J (INPO)" <MossDJ at INPO.org> wrote:
>
>> Well, I'm one of "those dang RTTY guys", and I didn't QRM anybody.
>> What I saw last weekend was a lot of very good RTTY operators.  May
>> have been a few less than perfect, but I'd venture that there were as
>> many or more equally bad on any mode.  As a group, I'd take the RTTY
>> folks over any other.  What I really have no use for, is those who
>> feel that their mode, or their subband, is above all others.  Sorry,
>> but those who paint whole groups with the same broad brush get no
>> sympathy and little respect from me.
>>
>> Dave KE4UW
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: secc-bounces at contesting.com on behalf of Daniel L. Jeswald
>> Sent: Fri 1/14/2005 5:21 PM
>> To: secc at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [SECC] RTTY fastest growing
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree.  Those dang TTY guys don't give a rip.
>>
>> And if you don't care to read what I have to say.....whoopie doooo.
>> If ya
>> cain't stand the fire, stay off the grill.
>>
>> Dan/W4NTI
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Schulz Jonathan" <jonathan.schulz at siemens.com>
>> To: <secc at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 4:11 PM
>> Subject: RE: [SECC] RTTY fastest growing
>>
>>
>> > It is certainly nice to see the helpful, courteous amateur spirit
>> is alive
>> > and well.
>> >
>> > In my younger "damn the world days" I would have made it a point to
>> screw
>> > with you every chance I got, now I'll just filter anything that
>> comes from
>> > you directly into the bit bucket...
>> >
>> >
>> > 73
>> > Jon
>> > K9JS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
>> > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person or
>> entity
>> > to
>> > which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged
>> material
>> > protected by state and federal law. Any review, retransmission,
>> > dissemination or other use by other persons or entities is strictly
>> > prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended
>> recipient or
>> > an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient,
>> kindly
>> > contact the sender and delete the material, including any
>> attachments, in
>> > any form and from any computer.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Daniel L. Jeswald [mailto:w4nti at mindspring.com]
>> > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 4:03 PM
>> > To: der; secc at contesting.com
>> > Subject: Re: [SECC] RTTY fastest growing
>> >
>> >
>> > Yep.  A good CW operator can cope with anything.  The REAL question
>> is how
>> > long it is going to take the CW ops to figure out how to blow a TTY
>> signal
>> > off the air.  I already know.
>> >
>> > Dan/W4NTI
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SECC mailing list
>> > SECC at contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date:
>> 1/10/2005
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SECC mailing list
>> SECC at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SECC mailing list
>> SECC at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005
>
> 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005