[SECC] fcc uses contest logs for evidence

[Gary McConville]

My take is that the ARRL is not part of any enforcement and unless
there was a supoena, then they should stay out of it, irregardless of
what happened!  At this point in time, both agencies should be focused
on the BPL problem!

Just my opinion...

Gary - WB4SQ

PS - Although I'm 100% legal, it makes me think twice about submitting
any logs to the ARRL!


--- Bill Coleman <aa4lr at arrl.net> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 26, 2005, at 6:10 PM, Dan/W4NTI wrote:
> 
> > You know something guys?  That really is a low move from the ARRL.
> >
> > I hate to say it but,  maybe Baxter has a point.
> 
> I agree that Ed has a point, but it also represents something of a 
> quandary for the ARRL.
> 
> Since the Amateur Service is supposed to be self-policing -- would it
> 
> be right for the ARRL to hold back this information, when it clearly 
> shows someone operating a station out of his licensing limits? To
> what 
> length should your ARRL dues to spend in order to protect the privacy
> 
> rights of such a violator?
> 
> It's a real catch-22 situation if I ever saw one. The ARRL loses
> either 
> way.
> 
> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
> Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
>              -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 


		
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html