[SECC] GQP rules

[Gary McConville]

Since we're trying to encourage GA stations, why not have some type of
DX mults for only GA stations?

--- Bill Coleman <aa4lr at arrl.net> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 11, 2005, at 6:02 PM, John Laney wrote:
> 
> > I feel more strongly about the multiplier situation.  If you allow
> > unlimited DX countries as multipliers, you encourage people to get
> on
> > and work nothing but DX. Some QSO Parties
> > allow for DX countries to count for two or three extra multpliers,
> but
> > no more.  I wouldn't strongly oppose such a change.
> 
> How about a multiplier for DX by continents? That's seven easily 
> identified multipliers.
> 
> > Allowing counties as multipliers tends to turn a QSO party inward.
> 
> Agreed. W7OT (ex-W4MS) made this point shortly before he had to leave
> 
> the SECC when he moved away.
> 
> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
> Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
>              -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 


		
Discover Yahoo! 
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html