----- Original Message ----
From: "ny4n@aol.com" <ny4n@aol.com>
To: ku8e@bellsouth.net; secc@contesting.com
Cc: w3dya@juno.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 10:25:34 AM
Subject: Re: [SECC] FW: Rovers/Mobiles: CW vs SSB
NY4N will be using CW only, unless there is a BIG push that all mobiles
use SSB too. Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From:
ku8e@bellsouth.netTo:
secc@contesting.comCc:
w3dya@juno.comSent: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 2:36 pm
Subject: [SECC] FW: Rovers/Mobiles: CW vs SSB
-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From:
w3dya@juno.comTo:
gqprovers@iham.usSubject: Rovers/Mobiles: CW vs SSB
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:07:26 +0000
I have your list of planned coverage but wonder if it's possible to get
a
list of
who will be CW only or SSB only. This would help me simplify my route
- it's
got a lot of bad roads so far!
I'm trying to cover the North and East down towards Savannah and would
make
an effort to hit those counties with NO CW commitment so far. I'm
concentrating
on counties East of a line from Fannin/Gilmer to Wilkinson and North of
I-16.
I don't think I'll get all the way South to Savannah but with a driver
you never can tell.
I know your efforts are aimed at getting all counties activated; my
effort is aimed
at activating counties on CW. Many
non-GA sta tions won't be working
SSB.
Thanks and 73,
Norm, W3DYA
w3dya@juno.com_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc