Hi Gary and SECC...I am in the same interest about skimmer...I am not going to condem it yet...it needs to be used in a contest and actually see it's uses...for my part as a M-M , it will maybe fill in some info that packet might be missing...but as with packet it has to be used with a grain of salt...it might miss-copy a call, and like packet all calls need to be copied and verified!! I refuse to jump on the bandwagon of the petition folks quite yet!! I am taking a wait and see attitude here....
de Rick NQ4I
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:11 AM, K9AY <
k9ay@k9ay.com> wrote:
Skimmer is certainly a topic worthy of debate about it's place in the rules,
but before I jump to a conclusion, I'd like to see real-world data on
contesting with Skimmer -- maybe even try it myself.
I recall similar debates about spotting nets/packet, computer logging,
SO2R -- even 'hired gun' guest ops.
73, Gary
K9AY
> Please consider signing this petition if you are opposed to
> Skimmer being allowed in the Single Opr category.
>
> The link is http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/skimmer
>
> If you sign it, please use your name followed by your callsign. When you
> sign it, you do not need to go to the next step where they try to get you
> to
> make a donation.
>
>
> Jeff KU8E
_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc