Thanks, Hal.  Taking your advice I have about 10 matches without the /140 and the original 1 match with.  It seems that ARRL didn’t do a good job putting out correct guidelines for the use of their own tool? 

Anyone else notice that as the event went on, many of the /140’s seems most interested in working each other?

Anyway, it was a lot of fun…and some of the 140’s were very, very good op’s.

From: Hal Kennedy [mailto:halken@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:24 AM
To: Robert Gerace
Subject: RE: [SECC] ARRL /140 Event Logging on LoTW?

I would resend them without the /140 and see what happens.  Nothing to loose.  Those fellows would have had to get a separate /140 certificate for their additional callsign – maybe they didn’t bother…

Hal N4GG

-----Original Message-----
From: secc-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Robert Gerace
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:28 PM
To: secc@contesting.com
Subject: [SECC] ARRL /140 Event Logging on LoTW?

I've logged over 25 contacts for the event, and uploaded all to LoTW.

Only one has matched up.

I've logged them as CALL/140 and the one match was CALL/140.

I'm confused, though, because I would think an ARRL event would log to LoTW, but 1 in 25 seems pretty low.

So, all this to ask, is there a 'correct' way to log the contacts to LoTW?  Would relogging them without the /140 work?

Thanks
73 de N3FY, Bob