I have operated from some big stations in
the Northeast (W2PV, K2LE/1, K1KI, K1ZM) and
from down here in the South (NQ4I) and I would say that it is extremely unlikely
that a station from down here can beat one of the big stations up North.
In fact, it is surprising that K3LR and K4JA did as well as they have done.
The problem is that those big stations are just too much closer to EU than we
are. They have several more hours a day of daylight to EU than we do and
they can hear the weaker level stations that we will never hear. NQ4I has
a super station with some great antennas but you can’t beat the
geography. As long as the rules stay the way they are, I doubt the outcome
will change.
When I operated from VT at K2LE/1, we could hear
the guys east of us working EU an hour before us and there was nothing we could
do about it. Imagine how much earlier VY2Z can hear EU.
But, I’m not sure that going to a distance
based scoring system will make that much difference. The Northeast will
stay have longer EU openings and stronger signals. The longer openings
and the higher rates will probably still give the NE the advantage unless some
sort of multiplier is applied to the distance. Try and figure that one
out. It will be very interesting to see the results of rescoring some of
the top scores from NE and elsewhere to see what the effect will be. Let’s
wait and see what that shows before jumping into one camp or the other.
BTW, has anyone thought about how the DX
stations will react? I would guess that the
Certainly there is one certainty if the rules
are changed, i.e. the old scores (or the new ones) will no longer mean anything
compared to the new scores. Is that what we want? Why not simply
start a new contest using a distance based scoring and see what happens and
leave the ARRL DX Test as is?.
73,
Dennis, K2SX