[SEDXC] The ARRL Letter, Vol 19, No 25

Dave WD4RCO@CYOU.COM
Sat, 01 Jul 2000 09:36:43 -0700


--=====================_943000==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

FYI
-------------------------
>FLORIDA TOWER RULING DISAPPOINTS LEAGUE
>
>The ARRL is expressing disappointment at a recent US Appeals Court ruling in
>a four-year-old Florida Amateur Radio tower case. The US Court of Appeals
>for the Eleventh Circuit on May 31 affirmed a lower-court ruling against
>Lenard Persin, WB4HZQ, in his efforts to erect an 80-foot repeater and HF
>remote base tower in his side yard in Seminole County.
>
>"We are disappointed with the Court's ruling, which runs contrary to the
>clear and unambiguous meaning of the FCC's PRB-1 preemption decision," said
>ARRL Executive Vice President David Sumner, K1ZZ. The Eleventh Circuit
>ruling was doubly troubling because the ARRL had agreed to fund Persin's
>appeal in the case.
>
>In a six-page, unpublished decision, the Eleventh Circuit decided that the
>US District Court had not erred by applying "a balancing test rather than
>the reasonable accommodation test required by PRB-1."
>
>Sumner said that by letting stand the US District Court's reliance on the
>"balancing of interests" approach, the Appeals Court took a regulatory
>direction that the FCC has expressly labeled "not appropriate." He called it
>"incomprehensible" that the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals could have
>failed to follow the lead of the Eighth Circuit, which reaffirmed the
>"reasonable accommodation" and "minimum necessary regulation" principles of
>PRB-1 in a landmark 1994 case.
>
>Seminole County's ordinance restricts Amateur Radio towers to 35 feet
>without a special exception. The lower court agreed with Seminole County
>that Persin's request for a taller structure would be detrimental to the
>character and not consistent with the development trends of his
>neighborhood. Persin said one neighbor in particular fought his application
>on that basis. In District Court, Persin had presented--to no avail--expert
>testimony that a 35-foot tower would be ineffective and that the taller
>tower he requested would not change the character of the neighborhood nor
>affect property values.
>
>Persin says he believes the decision dealt "a fatal blow" to PRB-1 and that
>other jurisdictions will copy Seminole County's approach to dealing with
>Amateur Radio towers "since they now know it will hold up in court." The
>county's ordinance, Persin says, "was particularly designed to thwart
>PRB-1." He called for protection stronger than that offered by PRB-1.
>
>Sumner and ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, note, however, that,
>because the Eleventh Circuit opinion was not published, it will not serve as
>a precedent in future cases. Sumner says that, under PRB-1, municipalities
>continue to have "an absolute obligation" to reasonably accommodate Amateur
>Radio communication and to impose "the minimum practicable regulation to
>accomplish its legitimate purpose."


--=====================_943000==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<font size=6><b>FYI<br>
</font></b>-------------------------<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>FLORIDA TOWER RULING DISAPPOINTS LEAGUE<br>
<br>
The ARRL is expressing disappointment at a recent US Appeals Court ruling
in<br>
a four-year-old Florida Amateur Radio tower case. The US Court of
Appeals<br>
for the Eleventh Circuit on May 31 affirmed a lower-court ruling
against<br>
Lenard Persin, WB4HZQ, in his efforts to erect an 80-foot repeater and
HF<br>
remote base tower in his side yard in Seminole County.<br>
<br>
&quot;We are disappointed with the Court's ruling, which runs contrary to
the<br>
clear and unambiguous meaning of the FCC's PRB-1 preemption
decision,&quot; said<br>
ARRL Executive Vice President David Sumner, K1ZZ. The Eleventh
Circuit<br>
ruling was doubly troubling because the ARRL had agreed to fund
Persin's<br>
appeal in the case.<br>
<br>
In a six-page, unpublished decision, the Eleventh Circuit decided that
the<br>
US District Court had not erred by applying &quot;a balancing test rather
than<br>
the reasonable accommodation test required by PRB-1.&quot; <br>
<br>
Sumner said that by letting stand the US District Court's reliance on
the<br>
&quot;balancing of interests&quot; approach, the Appeals Court took a
regulatory<br>
direction that the FCC has expressly labeled &quot;not appropriate.&quot;
He called it<br>
&quot;incomprehensible&quot; that the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
could have<br>
failed to follow the lead of the Eighth Circuit, which reaffirmed
the<br>
&quot;reasonable accommodation&quot; and &quot;minimum necessary
regulation&quot; principles of<br>
PRB-1 in a landmark 1994 case.<br>
<br>
Seminole County's ordinance restricts Amateur Radio towers to 35
feet<br>
without a special exception. The lower court agreed with Seminole
County<br>
that Persin's request for a taller structure would be detrimental to
the<br>
character and not consistent with the development trends of his<br>
neighborhood. Persin said one neighbor in particular fought his
application<br>
on that basis. In District Court, Persin had presented--to no
avail--expert<br>
testimony that a 35-foot tower would be ineffective and that the
taller<br>
tower he requested would not change the character of the neighborhood
nor<br>
affect property values.<br>
<br>
Persin says he believes the decision dealt &quot;a fatal blow&quot; to
PRB-1 and that<br>
other jurisdictions will copy Seminole County's approach to dealing
with<br>
Amateur Radio towers &quot;since they now know it will hold up in
court.&quot; The<br>
county's ordinance, Persin says, &quot;was particularly designed to
thwart<br>
PRB-1.&quot; He called for protection stronger than that offered by
PRB-1.<br>
<br>
Sumner and ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, note, however,
that,<br>
because the Eleventh Circuit opinion was not published, it will not serve
as<br>
a precedent in future cases. Sumner says that, under PRB-1,
municipalities<br>
continue to have &quot;an absolute obligation&quot; to reasonably
accommodate Amateur<br>
Radio communication and to impose &quot;the minimum practicable
regulation to<br>
accomplish its legitimate purpose.&quot;</blockquote><br>
</html>

--=====================_943000==_.ALT--