[SEDXC] What gives??

[Keith LaBorde - K4KAL]

Did you guys hear 75 Meter SSB last night.
I got so fed up, I just went to bed.
Then they start arguing on his xmit freq and call one another names, etc.
CW may be a better route to take on some bands.

Earlier in the week there was two guys that sat on 3795.0 and called CQ DX
on top of the 3Y0X on purpose.  The said... they were having a QSO above 
3800.0
and since the DX station told everyone to call on there frequency, the 
figured they would
come on his and cause QRM on purpose.  It was like WWIII that night.

I hate to say it, but these guys think they own specific frequencies.
They are on there every night shooting the bull.
I have always had the attitude if a DX station comes on, I yield to them.
Let them have it....  I can move, not a big deal.

Keith

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary McConville" <wb4sq at yahoo.com>
To: "SEDXC" <SEDXC at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: [SEDXC] What gives??


> What irks me is not so much the cops but anyone who is stupid enough to
> tune up on the dx freq.  When I tune up the tube rig its 20khz away and
> I listen beforehand.  I hear a lot more simpleton, I mean simplex cw
> ops on the dx freq than ssb ops.
>
>
> --- Tommy <aldermant at alltel.net> wrote:
>
>> 3Y0X has been having a few problems with their log uploads, but given
>>
>> the magnitude of what they are doing, that is probably to be
>> expected. I had QSO's on 20m and 80m almost immediately show up in
>> log. But for 17, 15, and 40m, it took about four day's for them to
>> appear, so I was very concerned. And to the point of going back for
>> second QSO's. But they did show up.
>>
>> The CW operators seem to be excellent, very good at picking up calls,
>>
>> and very good with rapid exchanges.
>>
>> No need to discuss the frequency cop's or the intentional QRMing, but
>>
>> I'll just never be able to understand how anyone could get any
>> satisfaction out of that type of activity!
>>
>> Tom - W4BQF
>>
>>
>> At Wednesday 07:34 AM 2/15/2006, you wrote:
>> >I've got the same problem from Sunday contacts on 15M ssb & 20cw.
>> On
>> >15M the op repeated my call several times and we clearly exchanged
>> >reports, but only the 17M & 20M ssb q's are in their e-log.
>> Sometimes
>> >dx picks me up as a WP but it was a definite WB...
>> >
>> >--- Keith LaBorde - K4KAL <k4kal at arrl.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I agree...
>> > >
>> > > I worked them on 10M SSB yesterday, and I heard him repeat my
>> call
>> > > sign
>> > > clearly.
>> > > Yet... the online log showed it as a 17M contact which I did not
>> > > need.
>> > > I think maybe the operator forgot to change the bands in the
>> logging
>> > > software or something.
>> > > Will have to work them again...
>> > >
>> > > Keith, K4KAL
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "David Thompson" <thompson at mindspring.com>
>> > > To: <sedxc at contesting.com>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:47 AM
>> > > Subject: [SEDXC] What gives??
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >I looked at the latest update of 3Y0 logs and my K4JRB/M 20
>> meter
>> > > qso is
>> > > > there but not the much more solid contacts on 17 and 15.  I see
>> > > WB4SQ who
>> > > > worked them just before me on 17 and I also see WA4HNL on 15.
>> I
>> > > thought
>> > > > he
>> > > > worked them on 17 SSB too.
>> > > >
>> > > > It says some logs are garbled.
>> > > >
>> > > > I did find a 3Y0PI qso on 24Mhz SSB in Jan 1994 so that moves
>> me
>> > > 320 on 12
>> > > > but wonder if they still have QSLs????
>> > > >
>> > > > Dave K4JRB
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > SEDXC mailing list
>> > > > SEDXC at contesting.com
>> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > SEDXC mailing list
>> > > SEDXC at contesting.com
>> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >__________________________________________________
>> >Do You Yahoo!?
>> >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> >http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >SEDXC mailing list
>> >SEDXC at contesting.com
>> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SEDXC mailing list
>> SEDXC at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> SEDXC mailing list
> SEDXC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
>