[SEDXC] About the Automobile License Tags ...
w4jbr
w4jbr at bellsouth.net
Thu Jun 3 11:48:45 PDT 2010
If you do decide to mount the tag on the front...be sure to mount it upside down...
LOL
Jack B. Ray, MPM
Aeroll Company
Quality Metal Fabrication
And Specialized Tooling
For the Aircraft Industry
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error,
please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy
any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
________________________________
From: Bob Mantell <k4esa at yahoo.com>
To: Weymouth Walker <weymouth01 at comcast.net>; "SEDXC at contesting.com" <sedxc at contesting.com>; "wb4sq at yahoo.com" <wb4sq at yahoo.com>
Sent: Thu, June 3, 2010 11:44:05 AM
Subject: Re: [SEDXC] About the Automobile License Tags ...
IF you do not renew it I belive you have to give it back. New law from a few years ago:
Re: HAM TAG RELOCATION
Posted by: "Don Jackson - K9MO" don at k9mo.net dwjackson at ymail.com
Date: Wed Jun 2, 2010 8:40 pm ((PDT))
Yes, you must surrender the old tag or A) move it to a different vehicle and
surrender the tag to that other vehicle or B) assign it to a newly purchased
vehicle. Moving to a different/new vehicle doesn't fix the issue of having
to pay special fees. Then, the only option for "keeping" the old ham tag is
signing an affidavit under oath stating that the tag was either damaged
beyond reclamation (or something along those words) or stolen. After
relocating your tag, to the front you are bound to get some questions from
the po-po.
73 de Bob,
K4ESA EM74qc
Bob Mantell
k4esa at yahoo.com
--- On Thu, 6/3/10, wb4sq at yahoo.com <wb4sq at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: wb4sq at yahoo.com <wb4sq at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [SEDXC] About the Automobile License Tags ...
To: "Weymouth Walker" <weymouth01 at comcast.net>, "SEDXC at contesting.com" <sedxc at contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, June 3, 2010, 5:14 PM
If anyone pulls their ham tag off, remember to put on the front.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre
On Jun 2, 2010 10:33 PM, Weymouth Walker <weymouth01 at comcast.net> wrote:
THIS MAIL WAS FORWARDED TO ME ... I HAVE
NOT ATTEMPTED TO VET THE MESSAGE ...
Wey / K8EAB ...
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ARRL Members Only Web site
> [mailto:memberlist at www.arrl.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 5:11 PM
> To: ------ at bellsouth.net
> Subject: About the Automobile License Tags
>
> Many of you have asked me about this, and about what
> we can do. In a word, we have been quietly and secretly
> "had" by our state legislators and governor, and at this
> point there is nothing we can do. This was done by the
> legislature quickly before any of the public could know
> anything about it. Remember this during the next
> elections.
> The word from our ASM for Legislative Affairs Jim Altman,
> W4UCK is as follows:
>
> "They attached user fees to everything in sight. Anything
> that had a fee attached, the fee was raised. Anything
> 'fee-able' that didn't have a fee, got one. A different
> example: there was an act passed called the "Judicial
> Operations Funding Act." It doubles all the filing fees
> for civil cases, they increased the "copy cost" for
> records on appeal to $10.00 per page (which can be
> hundreds, even thousands of pages). NOT ONE DIME of any
> of these "user fees" goes to fund the operation paying the
> fee, it ALL goes to the general fund. Annual corporate
> registration fees went from $30.00 to $50.00. This was
> not, I REPEAT NOT a tax increase. See HB1055
>
> Nothing has changed about the existence or ability to
> obtain
> our plates.
>
> The code section providing for our plate 40-2-75 has been
> repealed along with many others and replaced by the
> provisions of 40-2-86.1
>
> Our plates fall into a category of non-revenue sharing
> special plates. 'Non-revenue sharing" means a plate that
> is
> not on behalf of some organization that gets a cut of the
> proceeds of the sale of the plates. We will now pay
> $25.00
> for the manufacture of the plate, a special license plate
> fee (annual) of $35.00. All the money raised goes to the
> general fund. So do the volunteer firefighters. (HB 1055
> section 1-77)
>
> There is absolutely nothing the Governor or anyone else
> can
> do about this now. The Governor can not "repeal" nor
> revise
> a single word of the law. The only thing that can be done
> is to elect a legislature that will have the honesty and
> courage to call a tax increase what it is, a tax increase,
> and
> to do so in a straight forward manner, like, raise taxes,
> instead hiding behind this sort of stuff. This was all
> done in less than an hour on the 36th day of the session."
>
>
> Jim Altman
> jaltman at altlaw.com
>
> So my recommendation is that Georgia hams vote with our
> feet: Boycott the Amateur Radio License tags until the
> fees
> are dropped. That way they don't get our money and perhaps
> they get our message. And above all, vote all of them out
> next election.
>
> Eugene C. Clark, W4AYK, Section Manager, Georgia
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ARRL Georgia Section
> Section Manager: Eugene C Clark, W4AYK
> w4ayk at arrl.org
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SEDXC mailing list
SEDXC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
_______________________________________________
SEDXC mailing list
SEDXC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
_______________________________________________
SEDXC mailing list
SEDXC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
More information about the SEDXC
mailing list