[SESprint] Rules and conventions
Jim White, K4OJ
k4oj at tampabay.rr.com
Mon Feb 2 13:27:21 EST 2004
Actually George there were a lot of guys, like me, who kept messing up
and flip flopping the call in the front instead at the end of the
exchange and because of this in the middle of QSOs would get hammered by
a caller since the call was on the end and they of course assumed the
QSO was done and they were fresh meat when in fact it was actually
mid-QSO so in reality a lot of the errors made caused undo confusion...
Mine was longer than yours!
OJ
Georgek5kg at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 2/2/2004 10:43:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> n4zr at contesting.com writes:
>
>
>>I was amused to note that one of the top scorers in the sprint continues to
>>
>>violate the convention (not a rule, certainly) about sending your call at
>>the end of an S&P exchange but in the middle of a run exchange. I am
>>gradually getting used to it, so it doesn't boggle me the way it once did,
>>but surely this doesn't help his score.
>>
>
>
> Yes, and I ran across one guy who was continually CQing on one frequency. I
> refused to work him. I was also surprised to hear ops - ones whom I would
> have thought would have known better - sending their calls at the end of the
> exchange when they should not have. (Hows' that for a run-on sentence?)
>
> Geo...
>
> George I. Wagner, K5KG
> Productivity Resources LLC
> 941-312-9450
> 941-312-9460 fax
> 941-400-1960 cell
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SESprint mailing list
> SESprint at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sesprint
>
More information about the SESprint
mailing list