[SESprint] Score Comparisons, Claimed vs Allowed, NA Sprint CW Feb 2010
Ted Bryant
W4NZ at comcast.net
Tue Feb 16 12:28:10 PST 2010
"I'm wondering if the power level of the station enters strongly into the
error rate."
I don't see it. NA4K, who had the best error rate, was LOW power, tribander
and wires.
73, Ted W4NZ
-----Original Message-----
From: sesprint-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:sesprint-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Lee Hiers
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:54 PM
To: Southeast Sprint Coalition
Subject: Re: [SESprint] Score Comparisons, Claimed vs Allowed,NA Sprint
CW Feb 2010
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, John Laney <k4bai at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> Hope I did those right. What can we learn from this?
> Did he copy it OK
Without going back and looking...if I recall, most of the higher score
reductions are from stations that were using less than full legal
power (or maybe less-efficient antennas). With all the QRM that is
experienced in Sprints, I'm wondering if the power level of the
station enters strongly into the error rate.
Maybe I'll be able to join y'all again one of these days...
--
Lee Hiers
"Have Dobro Will Travel"
More information about the SESprint
mailing list