[Skimmertalk] Skimmer Experiance: 160M and 10M
Pete Smith
n4zr at contesting.com
Tue Dec 23 06:31:21 EST 2008
Great data, Jamie - thanks. You didn't by any chance record any of these
sequences, did you? We should be so lucky!
Would you be willing to share the stored CW messages you were using during
those S&P contacts? I'm trying to figure out what specific sequences might
have led Skimmer to mistakenly identifying you as the runner. When S&P, is
it your normal practice only to send your call, and then only once? Do you
ever send it twice in a single response?
Do you happen to recall if any of these S&P contacts were made on the first
call?
73, Pete
At 09:32 PM 12/22/2008, Jamie Dupree NS3T wrote:
>I'll take these contacts as Pete N4ZR reviewed them.
>
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7086.3 CQ 5 dB 26 wpm 2142z 30 Nov
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7025.6 CQ 5 dB 27 wpm 2142z 30 Nov
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7086.3 CQ 7 dB 27 wpm 2140z 30 Nov
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7025.6 CQ 9 dB 27 wpm 2139z 30 Nov
>
> From 2139 to 2142, I might well have been CQ'ing as Pete
>theorized. I know I was calling CQ on 40 without any luck.
>My only contact during this time was a QSO on 20 meters,
>which probably means that was on my second radio. Most
>likely I was calling CQ high in the band, and it could have
>been way up at 7086. I was not calling CQ down at 7025 I bet.
>
>>
>>Were you really on both of those frequencies, back and forth, within 3
>>minutes? I think it's more likely that you were on 7025.6, that N0XR
>>copied you both there and on the image. With a local oscillator
>>frequency of ~7056, pretty standard for SoftRocks on 40M, the image of
>>7025.6 would be heard at 7086.3.
>>
>>This series is harder to figure out:
>
> From 2102 to 2113, I was definitely working 40 meters S&P.
>I have 9 contacts in my log as I worked my way up the band.
>I am very sure I was not calling CQ.
>
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7045.8 CQ 11 dB 27 wpm 2113z 30 Nov
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7051.8 CQ 24 dB 28 wpm 2110z 30 Nov
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7062.2 CQ 11 dB 29 wpm 2109z 30 Nov
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7082.0 CQ 16 dB 27 wpm 2104z 30 Nov
>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7025.0 CQ 5 dB 29 wpm 2102z 30 Nov
>
>Some other places where I know I was S&P and not CQ'ing:
>
>14065 at 1824z I worked ZY7C S&P
>>N0XR-2 NS3T 14065.2 CQ 23 dB 28 wpm 1824z 30 Nov
>
>14074 at 1816 I worked KH7X S&P
>>>N0XR-2 NS3T 14074.6 CQ 13 dB 29 wpm 1817z 30 Nov
>
>14064 I worked DF8IXZ and HC5WW S&P; 14063 PY2NA
>>>N5RR NS3T 14064.2 CQ 17 dB 30 wpm 1813z 30 Nov
>
>14059 I worked 3X5A S&P
>>>N0XR-2 NS3T 14059.3 CQ 6 dB 28 wpm 1811z 30 Nov
>>>N5RR NS3T 14059.5 CQ 14 dB 30 wpm 1811z 30 Nov
>
>I worked VE7SV S&P
>>>N0XR-4 NS3T 7045.6 CQ 26 dB 25 wpm 1433z 30 Nov
>
>definitely me calling CQ
>>>W0QL NS3T 3537.9 CQ 11 dB 23 wpm 1056z 30 Nov
>>>N0XR-8 NS3T 3538.1 CQ 6 dB 23 wpm 1056z 30 Nov
>
>me working S&P on 20m
>>>N0XR-2 NS3T 14062.4 CQ 17 dB 29 wpm 1554z 29 Nov
>>>N0XR-2 NS3T 14059.9 CQ 13 dB 32 wpm 1551z 29 Nov
>>>N0XR-2 NS3T 14053.8 CQ 16 dB 28 wpm 1549z 29 Nov
>>>N0XR-2 NS3T 14066.7 CQ 14 dB 30 wpm 1426z 29 Nov
More information about the Skimmertalk
mailing list