[Skimmertalk] Category Definitions
Joe Subich, W4TV
w4tv at subich.com
Wed Jul 2 02:05:19 EDT 2008
David,
My thoughts are actually similar to those of Hans with one
exception ... three options - take your pick
single operator classic (SOC): One operator performs all functions
(including all station adjustments, maintenance and repairs)
without assistance from any other person. Receivers capable of
duplex operation are not permitted (e.g. no SO2R, no skimmer).
SCP, history files and similar data checking techniques would
not be permitted Memory keyers are permitted but repeating
CQs (timed CQ) are not permitted. Except in RTTY events, the
operator/receiver interface must be entirely audio (100 - 5,000
Hz), QSO content may not be represented visually. Panadapters
or other devices which visually depict signals outside the
100 Hz - 5 KHz band are prohibited. Mode is defined by the
method of transmission: CW = on/off keying, RTTY = FSK, Voice
= analog SSB, e.g. the emission as observed on a spectrum
analyzer).
Single operator unlimited (SOU): same as single operator but
duplex receivers (e.g., SO2R and skimmer), SCP, visual
interfaces, SCP, and timed CQ are permitted.
Single operator plus cluster (SOP): same as SOU except cluster and
other external spotting networks are permitted.
- or -
single operator classic (SOC): One operator performs all functions
(including all station adjustments, maintenance and repairs)
without assistance from any other person. Receivers capable of
duplex operation are not permitted (e.g. no SO2R, no skimmer).
SCP, history files and similar data checking techniques would
not be permitted Any demodulation technique and operator
interface would be is permitted in all modes (mode is determined
by transmission method: CW = on/off keying, RTTY = FSK, Voice =
analog SSB, e.g. the emission as observed on a spectrum analyzer).
Single operator unlimited (SPU): same as single operator but duplex
receivers (e.g., SO2R and skimmer) and SCP are permitted.
Single operator plus cluster (SOP): same as SOU except cluster and
other external spotting networks are permitted.
- or -
single operator (SO): One operator performs all functions without
(including all station adjustments, maintenance and repairs)
assistance from any other person. Duplex receivers (e.g.,
SO2R and skimmer) are permitted. Any demodulation technique
and operator interface would be is permitted in all modes (mode
is determined by transmission method: CW = on/off keying, RTTY
= FSK, Voice = analog SSB, e.g. the emission as observed on a
spectrum analyzer).
Single operator plus cluster (SOP): same as SO except cluster and
other external spotting networks are permitted.
"Shared cluster" networks (e.g. clusters feeding only CQ spots)
would be permitted in the single op plus cluster and multi-op
classes. "Private clusters" located outside a station's 500
meter circle would be considered remote receivers and would be
prohibited.
I would also modify the "power" classes to base the categories
on a simplified EIRP and not transmitter output power.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: skimmertalk-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:skimmertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Gilbert
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:23 PM
> To: skimmertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: [Skimmertalk] Category Definitions
>
>
>
> One of the reasons I subscribed to this new reflector was
> that I thought
> it might lead to some discussion on what might be desirable
> for category
> definitions looking forward, and I suspect that the various contest
> sponsors had similar hopes for usable feedback. So instead
> of getting
> derailed by excursions into no-code and ADA (for which personal
> contribution I apologize), maybe it would be more productive to hear
> some thoughts on what should constitute the intent of a baseline
> category for amateur radio contesting. There have been
> several comments
> regarding the operating aids that already exist with logging
> programs,
> SCP, keying buffers, CW decoders, waterfalls, etc, but if you
> had your
> choice, where would you draw the line (if at all) for an
> operator-emphasized category?
>
> In the interests of keeping this civil, let's not turn this in to an
> argument. I'd like to suggest that anyone who sees fit to offer an
> opinion simply list what they would include or not include as being
> permissible, and why, and then maybe refrain from immediate
> counter-posts for just a bit. If you think that different flavors of
> contests (DX, domestic, etc) warrant different treatment, you
> might want
> to try to break that out as well.
>
> I don't know if that will work, but at least I tried ...
>
> 73,
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Skimmertalk mailing list
> Skimmertalk at contesting.com
> http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk
More information about the Skimmertalk
mailing list