[Skimmertalk] Archive?

[K1AR at aol.com]

What Ed said. 
 
A great deal of the posts regarding skimmer on CQ-Contest were generated by  
people trying to draw attention to themselves. The evidence is that their  
passion miraculously stopped once we provided a focused medium, albeit  smaller, 
to discuss the topic with those having a common  interest.
 
I think K1KI and I would lose our moderator positions if we brought  the 
thread back to CQ-Contest. Hmmm, on the other hand, that has some appeal as  well. 
:-)
 
73 John, K1AR
 
PS: BTW, there are now over 40 subscribers to this list.
 
 
In a message dated 6/29/2008 12:13:20 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
w0yk at msn.com writes:

The  Skimmer dialogue on CQ-Contest overwhelmed the reflector and went to  
essentially zero here on this reflector.  Either everthing has been said  or the 
posters don't feel strong enough about anything to make the effort to  come 
here and say it.  Let's not start Skimmer threads on CQ-Contest  again.

73,
Ed - W0YK

------Original Message------
From:  Pete Smith
Sender: skimmertalk-bounces at contesting.com
To:  skimmertalk at contesting.com
Sent: Jun 29, 2008 08:47
Subject:  [Skimmertalk] Archive?

This reflector seems to be moribund - is there  an archive?  I wonder if it 
isn't time to permit Skimmer as a subject  on CQ-Contest again, so long as 
posts are not rules-related.

73,  Pete  N4ZR

_______________________________________________
Skimmertalk  mailing  list
Skimmertalk at contesting.com
http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk


Sent  from my  BlackBerry

_______________________________________________
Skimmertalk  mailing  list
Skimmertalk at contesting.com
http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk





**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.      (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)