[Skimmertalk] CW Skimmer v1.5 and Super Check Partial Filtering

[Jeff Maass]

G'day Dick:

Nothing new heard here.

We used version 1.4 (3 instances) at PJ2T for the CQWW 160 CW Contest.


73,  Jeff   K8ND


> -----Original Message-----
> From: skimmertalk-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:skimmertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of W3OA
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 6:58 AM
> To: skimmertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: [Skimmertalk] CW Skimmer v1.5 and Super Check 
> Partial Filtering
> 
> Is there any further information on this subject?
> 
> Should we drop back to version 1.4 for the ARRL DX contest 
> two weeks from now?
> 
> 73 - Dick, W3OA
> 
> 
> 
> >/ From: Jeff Maass [mailto:jmaass at ... 
> ><http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk>]
> />/ Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:08 PM />/ To: 
> 'skimmertalk at ... 
> <http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk>'
> />/ Subject: CW Skimmer v1.5 and Super Check Partial 
> Filtering />/ />/ I have upgraded my installation from v1.4 
> to v1.5, />/ and see a difference in how it's filtering 
> spotted />/ calls.
> />/
> />/ I am configured to use MASTERDX.DTA and set to />/ 
> "Paranoid" Callsign Validation.
> />/
> />/ With v1.4, only DX callsigns were passed. With v1.5, />/ 
> I am seeing US and Canadian callsigns make it through />/ the filter.
> />/
> />/ Has anyone else noted this? Explanation?
> />/
> />/ 73, Jeff K8ND
> /
> I've had this problem confirmed by another CW Skimmer user, 
> and Alex is looking into it.
> 
> I've dropped back to Skimmer version 1.4 to allow properly 
> filtering DX.
> 
> 73,  Jeff  K8ND
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Skimmertalk mailing list
> Skimmertalk at contesting.com
> http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk
> 
>