[Skimmertalk] FW: SSB + Skimmer idea

Pete Smith N4ZR n4zr at contesting.com
Mon Dec 8 08:01:50 EST 2014

Bob, I think the answer to "how hard would it be" is "very hard."  Try 
googling speech recognition and DARPA. Opinions vary somewhat, but DARPA 
is throwing a good deal of money in 2014 at a problem very like ours 
would be.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 12/7/2014 10:00 PM, Bob Wilson, N6TV wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:57 PM, David Robbins <k1ttt at arrl.net> wrote:
>> What needs to be modified would be logging software to enable additional
>> radio station identification.
> Well, modifying the logging software will be much easier than getting
> thousands of contesters to upgrade and use it, especially when you think
> about all the different voice keyer hardware people are using (not just PC
> sound cards).
>> The idea is to identify stations by transmitting CW ID at high rate of
>> speed
>> (at maximum speed that skimmers can accept), at intervals that would be
>> determined by the operator's behaviour (CQing vs. searching).
>> CW ID should not be set to tax outside ops' hearing and would be for
>> skimmers only (although I would not exclude humans entirely).
> In theory this could work.  In practice, probably not.  It requires too
> much change before it becomes useful, not to mention the inevitable
> complaints about all those extra high speed CW "bleeps" at the end of every
> CQ message, even if auto-notch can filter it out.
> Consider instead that voice recognition software is now commonplace, for
> example, hands free voice dialing in cars ("Call office"), Dragon
> NaturallySpeaking for PCs, Google Voice automated transcription of
> voicemail to text, automated customer services telephone systems that
> prompt "What is your account number?", etc.
> How hard can it be to teach a voice recognition program to recognize
> commonly used radio phonetics and numbers: Alpha, Bravo, Radio, Zanzibar,
> etc.?  Sooner than you might expect, we will have RTTY and voice skimmers
> that work almost as well as CW Skimmer, with no need for thousands of
> contesters to change hardware or software to take advantage of it.
> 73,
> Bob, N6TV
> _______________________________________________
> Skimmertalk mailing list
> Skimmertalk at contesting.com
> http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk

More information about the Skimmertalk mailing list