[Skimmertalk] RP-16 front end tenderness

[Dave Pascoe]

Try small attachments now...should work...just don't abuse it...keep them
small (<2-3MB).

73,
Dave


On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 3:16 PM Bob Wilson, N6TV <n6tv at arrl.net> wrote:

> I wish this reflector would allow posting of small images or attachments (I
> think it's a setting that can be changed).
>
> I'm resending my last post without images (see below).  A copy with images
> was sent directly to K9IMM.
>
> 73,
> Bob, N6TV
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:08 PM Bob Wilson, N6TV <n6tv at arrl.net> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 7:26 AM Ted Gisske <gisske at offex.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Front-end protection for your new Red Pitaya is a worthwhile investment.
> >> RP
> >> specs the maximum input voltage at 1V P-P.
> >
> >
> > Ted,
> >
> > In which RP spec did you find this number?
> >
> > I'm looking at https://www.redpitaya.com/n86/new-stemlab-sdr, and under
> *Technical
> > Specifications* it says the "full scale" RF input range is 0.5 Vpp / -2
> > dBm, but it gives no maximum input voltage.  I assume it just clips over
> > 0.5 V.
> >
> > <image removed>
> >
> > The only mention of "1V P-P" is under the RF *Output* section (because
> > the SDR 122.88-16 is also a signal generator).  It says Full-scale RF
> > *output*:  1 Vpp / +4 dbM.
> >
> > <image removed>
> >
> >
> >> This is probably so low due to the 1:14 input transformers.
> >
> >
> > They are not using a 14:1 transformer in this board.
> >
> > I found a "Development" schematic for the STEMlab SDR 122-16 here:
> >
> >
> https://redpitaya.readthedocs.io/en/latest/developerGuide/122-16/shem.html
> >
> >
> > The input transformer (TRF1) is listed as an MABA-007159.  The datatsheet
> > <https://cdn.macom.com/datasheets/MABA-007159-000000.pdf> specifies that
> > it is a "1:1 Transmission Line Transformer" with maximum DC (?) power of
> > 250 mW -or- maximum DC (?) current of 30 ma.  In a 50 ohm system, the
> > former would be 3.5 VDC and the latter 1.5 VDC.  1.5 VDC is equivalent to
> > 2.36 V RMS AC, I think, much higher than 1 V P-P.
> >
> > The next transformer (TRF3) is a WBC4-1TLB.  The datasheet
> > <https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/597/wbc-463492.pdf> specifies that
> it
> > is 4:1 "Wideband Transformer", 1/4 Watt (250 mW) input power, 250 ma max
> > current rating, 300Vrms (!) interwinding isolation.
> >
> > After that there is an impedance bridge made out of resistors that feeds
> > the input of the 16-bit ADC converter.  Unfortunately, they don't list
> the
> > ADC part number, and it seems to be covered up by the heat sink.  I
> assume
> > it can handle much more than 1 V P-P.
> >
> > The DXE protector does a great job of limiting this voltage to 2V P-P.
> >> That, however, is twice the rated max voltage of the RP.  Not good
> enuf...
> >>
> >
> > It may indeed be good enough.  2V P-P into 50 ohms is only 80 mW.
> >
> > In sum, I don't think adding extra front end protection is really
> > necessary, unless you can measure 250 mW or more of RF input to the
> > receiver when you are transmitting, after the Front End Protector and
> > preamp.
> >
> > My transmit antennas are directly above my Skimmer antennas (small
> > suburban lot here).  Before with the old RP-14 I used a DXE Front End
> > Protector on the Input to the 11 dB Clifton Labs Preamp, but never added
> a
> > second FEP between the pre-amp and the external 14:1 transformer.  I've
> > transmitted many times (but not for long) with full power, and the RPs
> > continue to perform fine after I stop transmitting.
> >
> > Of course, I've long since concluded that it is best to completely shut
> > down all skimming (or at least posts to the RBN) while operating full
> power
> > for long periods, such as in a contest.  There are just way too many
> > spurious signals generated by a nearby transmitter, overwhelming the
> > skimmer software and CPU (especially if RTTY Skimming).
> >
> > If your goal is to be able to operate a contest while keeping your
> > skimmers going full time at the same location, I think you may be
> > disappointed with all the "self-spots" that are generated, spots that
> might
> > get you disqualified from the contest (even if they are all "busted"
> spots
> > like K9SMM, MK9IMM, etc.).
> >
> > 73,
> > Bob, N6TV
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Skimmertalk mailing list
> Skimmertalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/skimmertalk/attachments/20190711/f62396ac/attachment.html>