[Skimmertalk] 6m bad spots

[Andy KU7T]

Thanks Gabriel.

Why is 6m so different?
How do you suppose to handle these different settings for multiband skimming with Skimmer server?

73,
Andy

Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Gabriel - EA6VQ <ea6vq_ml at dxmaps.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 5:29:02 AM
To: 'Andy KU7T' <ku7t at ku7t.org>; skimmertalk at contesting.com <skimmertalk at contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [Skimmertalk] 6m bad spots


Andy,



For 6m is much better to have the validation level set to "Aggressive" in CW-Skimmer and also tick the "Don't send VHF+ spots to the RBN server if SNR <= 1dB" option in Aggregator.



It is the only way to keep the number of false spots at an acceptable level. I do it in that way and it works fine.



73. Gabriel – EA6VQ

www.dxmaps.com<http://www.dxmaps.com>

www.vqlog.com<http://www.vqlog.com>



De: Skimmertalk [mailto:skimmertalk-bounces+ea6vq_ml=dxmaps.com at contesting.com] En nombre de Andy KU7T
Enviado el: sábado, 13 de junio de 2020 20:26
Para: skimmertalk at contesting.com
Asunto: [Skimmertalk] 6m bad spots



Hi,



My skimmer creates lots of busted spots on 6m. How do others configure their CW Skimmer or RBN aggregator to avoid this? It seems others do not have this issue… I am not transmitting nearby.



Thanks

Andy

KU7T



Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/skimmertalk/attachments/20200614/2b757e2e/attachment.html>