I use the RP-16 to skim 15 bands of CW, divided as follows

RP-16A: 7 "main" Bands:  80, 40, 30, 20, 17, 15, Low 10 - CW and RTTY Skimming
RP-16B: 8 "secondary" Bands: 2200, 630, 160, 60, 12, High 10, Low 6, High 6 - CW Skimming only

RP14:  8 bands of FT8 with automatic Day/Twilight/Night rotation via SM7IUN scripts, 160 to 6m.

73,
Bob, N6TV


On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 11:26 AM Andy KU7T <ku7t@ku7t.org> wrote:
Hi,

I am using a single Z400 PC with the new RP 16 bit SDR to skim CW and FT8. 

I made a few experiments. It seems if I run 8 bands FT8/WSJT-X, I often get time periods with no decodes. If I reduce the number of bands to 2 - 3, so that the CPU utilization spikes stay below 100%, I actually get more spots out.  Last night, my number of spots in 24 hours increased by 100% after I only skimmed 40,30,20 on FT8 (10 on CW).

So, it seems to me, WSJT-X is very time critical and if it cannot decode things in time, it just drops the data. That is unfortunate, as for skimming, I would not mind waiting 5 seconds to get the decodes out, as that would probably level the CPU util spikes more... Anyway, it is what it is, and I am not sure if the WSJT-X guys would be interested in looking into an optimization like that. 

I am trying to evaluate my options. I list them here in case someone sees other options or errors in my thinking.

  1. 2nd PC: PC1 skims maybe 6 bands in CW and FT8 from first receiver, PC2 skims the rest from the 2nd receiver
  2. 2nd RP: Run all FT8 bands on an RP with the Linux skimmer (not WSJT-X) and use PC1 for CW (and maybe one or two bands of RTTY)
I believe the 2nd option is much cheaper on equipment and running costs. Comments? What do others do?

Thanks,
Andy
KU7T
_______________________________________________
Skimmertalk mailing list
Skimmertalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk