[TenTec] The demise of manufacture

[Dale L. Martin]

Nick,
I tried to respond directly, but got an unable-to-deliver message
saying your domain was refusing the message (guess it won't
accept personal messages during business hours...hi...

Here's my response, though....

Nick,

I don't believe Ten-Tec manufactures a general coverage ham
transceiver.

If they did, then maybe there would be more reason/need for AM.
But, in a ham band only radio??  I don't think it's needed.

73,
Dale, kg5u
-----Original Message-----
From: Marchitelli, Nick #45CS/SCBBH
<NICK.MARCHITELLI@pafb.af.mil>
To: kg5u@hal-pc.org <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Date: Thursday, January 29, 1998 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The demise of manufacture


>Why make a general coverage receiver that has no AM
capability...Makes no
>sense to me
>Don't get me wrong, I luv my Ten-tec but if they had AM they
would be the
>perfect rig...
>I occasionally listen to AM on 3.885, its different, fun and
challenging
>Am is also popular on 20m and 10m when the band opens more
>All that money for the IV and no AM???
>to each his own I guess
>Nick
> ----------



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm