[TenTec] CQ Magazine review of Omni-VI+

Duane Calvin dcalvin@austin.ibm.com
Wed, 04 Mar 1998 10:24:04 -0600

I agree - "CQ" magazine's reviews of equipment have become less than
useful, and in some cases misleading.  I like the ARRL's test report
format, but even they occasionally leave things out that I would have
liked to have seen comments about.  I don't know if CQ's reviewers are
handcuffed in what they can write, or if a "general impression" is all
they are able to provide.  Either way, I don't find their writeups very
helpful in understanding a new piece of gear's high and low points, or
how it compares to the competition.

	73,  Duane   AC5AA   (but I like my Omni-VI+)
Duane A. Calvin      "All statements are mine only, not my employer's."
dacalvin@us.ibm.com -or- dcalvin@austin.ibm.com
evenings:  ac5aa@juno.com

FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm