[TenTec] CQ Magazine review of Omni-VI+

[Loren E. Page]

>Charles D. Shinn writes:
>I agree. It would appear that virtually all equipment reviews are 
>tainted by the inability of the reviewer to express themselves because
of real >or imaginary "Loss of Advertising Revenue". Business is poor
these days.
>Cutting out those advert bux to an unfriendly rag might be a good move 
>for some that might be on the edge.....Chuck

I couldn't agree more. Reviews by CQ are not worth the expenditure of
time. I've found QST to be much more thorough in evaluations of
equipment.

Loren W7BWI


_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm