[TenTec] Front End Protection

Ed Tanton n4xy@att.net
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 17:38:56 -0400


At 11:24 AM 10/12/98 EDT, KMerzel@aol.com wrote:
>
///snip
How can this arrangement be "transparent" to a 100 watt
>output at these values and still dissipate a static charge?
///snip


Hi Ken... think about it: static charges may be considered as having high
voltage-low current properties. The average anti-static armband for
CMOS/etc. solder-workstation work has a 10M resistor to ground. 100k is a
LOT lower than that, yet, in comparison to 50 ohms might as well not be
there to the tx. There IS a time-constant involved, so it is not
instantaneous. Also, we are NOT talking about lightning here, just the kind
of build-up you may observe on any antenna as a storm approaches.


73    
__________________________________________________________
Ed Tanton   N4XY		                      EMAIL: n4xy@att.net   
189 Pioneer Trail
Marietta, GA  30068-3466	       TEL: (770)579-3933 V/MBX/FAX
__________________________________________________________
INTERESTS:   QRP     BoatAnchors   Test Equipment     Photography
CW: 99.9%             Mercury Paddle # 0214          QRP to 150W: 95%
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Think you can, think you can't: either way you're right!"      Henry Ford
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm