[TenTec] TenTec RX-320 S-meter question.

[Jim Loase]

I agree with most of what you said but I still beleive that to work weak signal
under trying conditions you can't beat CW. I have not used the PSK mode but from
what I have read it may be a good contender.

Jim
W8IT

Caitlyn Martin wrote:

> Hi, Jeff,
>
> > and just change
> > frequency or go back to CW where the real hams are. (Yes this is a stab
> > at the No-class tech's, if your so lazy not to learn CW then find another
> > hobby and leave us alone.)
>
> You know, if all the people who didn't like CW (myself included) left, that
> would be, oh... 80% of the ham community.  You'd have no bands left in
> nothing flat.  Oh, and I am not too lazy.  I worked hard to pass my 13 WPM
> on the *fourth* try some years ago.  The theory tests were easy by
> comparison, including the Advanced.
>
> Do not blast the no-code techs.  They are over 50% of the ham ranks, last I
> checked.  They are the majority.  They are more welcome to me than arrogant
> know-it-alls like you who want to tell me I am not a real ham because I do
> not and will not work an archaic, historical mode like CW.  Morse is
> wonderful for those who enjoy it, and I understand that it *was* a vital
> means of  communication in the not too distant past, but that was then and
> this is now.
>
> The best way to destroy this hobby is to drive people away.  In case you
> didn't read the FCC numbers last year (the only numbers that matter), for
> the very first time in history the number of licensed hams declined.  Oh,
> not by much, but the decline is real.
>
> Oh, and the FCC is about to restructure ham radio licensing.  We will have a
> report-and-order shortly.  CW will be deemphasized, and the required code
> speed for the top license won't be 20 WPM any more.  It won't even be 13, if
> my sources are correct.  I expect that when the ITU does away with the
> international requirement for CW, which will eventually happen, so will the
> FCC.
>
> You can gripe about it all you want, but you do not decide who is and is not
> a ham, or even a "real" ham.  The FCC does.
> >
> > Thank you, I do feel better now!
>
> So do I.  Much, much better.  It's been a while since I told one of you
> dinosaurs off after you went and insulted the majority of the ham community.
> Heck, I felt insulted, too. Oh, and for the older gentlemen on the list,
> dinosaur refers to an attitude, not age.  IMHO, you can be mentally young at
> 95, and a dinosaur and live in the past at 20, and I, for one, appreciate
> some of the older generation who elmered me along.
>
> 73,
> Caity
> KU4QD
> (who was a General before there was such a thing as a No-Code Tech)
>
> P.S.:  Flames in response will be filed on my machine at home under
> /dev/null
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm