[TenTec] Replies for Omni VI+ Service

[Steve Baron - KB3MM]

The desire to display may be the deciding factor at TT though....

Really rough when the dispplayed frequency really isn't a full measurement.

----- Original Message -----
From: <JimN0OCT@aol.com>
To: <SteveBaron@starlinx.com>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: October 20, 1999 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Replies for Omni VI+ Service


Hmmm, I don't have a separate VFO for the TR7, so I wouldn't know.  Besides,
the rig only runs semi-QSK.  I would guess that you would just have to
concentrate on something other than the display whilst sending. ;-)

73, Jim
NĜOCT

In a message dated 20-Oct-99 16:00:58 Central Daylight Time,
SteveBaron@starlinx.com writes:

>
>  Is't there a problem though ?
>
>  Working split and keying at a decent speed would require the counter to
make
>  a measurement prett fast - or maybe simply not measure while sending.
>
>  Lets see - if I was on the XMIT frequency for 0.1 seconds, what kind of
>  frequency read out resolution would I have ?



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm