[TenTec] Pegasus enhanced audio

[Jim FitzSimons]

The N4PY software lets you set the transmitt bandwidth.
Peace, Jim FitzSimons W7ANF

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Gusky" <mgusky@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 7:47 AM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Pegasus enhanced audio


> 
> Got a lot of response on this one....some private and those that all
> of you have seen on the reflector.  Interesting responses.
> 
> Perhaps we are missing the point here.  I am not advocating cranking
> the xmit BW out beyond the normal 2.4 or 2.7 Khz width, nor am I
> suggesting that a Pegasus will sound as good as the 756 PRO's or Mark
> V's with all the rack gear and $ studio mics on the input.  I am only
> looking for a way to make a marginal microphone (not necessarily the
> 705....could be any cheap RS mic)sound better.  It would appear to me
> that the equalizer would redistribute, and perhaps help, some of the
> lows that normally get lost in the input of most rigs. I have
> listened to W2IHY's demo audio clips from his web site and they sound
> pretty good...at least better than most audio you(I) hear on 75 these
> days. I also agree that those folks running rack gear on 20 are in
> the high power arena.  However, you can have a fairly decent QSO on
> 75 or 40 without all the high power.  After all the discussion....I
> did learn that there are folks running the W2IHY EQ with the Pegasus.
> 
> Tnx for all the input.
> 
> 73
> Mike
> K5UX
> 
> 
> --- Richard B Drake <rbdrake@erols.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The whole point of Single Sideband Suppressed Carrier is to
> > improve communications ability by concentrating as much energy as
> > possible into radiating the "essential" parts of the human voice.
> > By definition, you sacrifice some fidelity to do that. I see no
> > problem with using an equalizer to redistribute the spectrum in an
> > effort to improve the sound quality. But to do as you suggest here
> > is ridiculous. I am laughing at the time and money they have
> > wasted on ignorance. Why don't they just use AM?



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com