[TenTec] More CW-Only Rig
James Duffer
dufferjames@hotmail.com
Mon, 08 Jan 2001 06:15:24 -0600
<html><DIV>
<P><BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>From: "Mike Siegel" <KI6PR@ELITE.NET>
<DIV></DIV>>To: <TENTEC@CONTESTING.COM>
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:37:37 -0800
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV><STRONG>>>As I pointed out, CW is being de-emphasized. A rig built from the bottom up </STRONG>
<DIV></DIV><STRONG>>as a CW-only rig, and completely optimized to make it absolutely the best CW </STRONG>
<DIV></DIV><STRONG>>rig available, would certain help to generate more interest in the mode, </STRONG>
<DIV></DIV><STRONG>>extending the life of the mode. And, if CW has to die (as some say), this </STRONG>
<DIV></DIV><STRONG>>may be our last hurrah for the mode. </STRONG>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Mike, I believe you have answered your own question. Why would a profit motivated company develope a CW Mode <STRONG>Only </STRONG>transceiver for a mode that is being "de-emphasized"?</DIV>
<DIV>I would think that options and modifications to multimode rigs will be the answer i.e, qsk, AGC, Coherent CW, filters and so on.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>73, Jim WD4AIR</DIV><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p></html>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com