[TenTec] DSP filtering Negative Feelings
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:56:06 -0700
I agree with you after my 50 years of ham radio there is nothing
compared to DSP.
What sold me on it was a JRC NRD-545 receiver I purchased about a year
ago. That has full DSP with 40 bit processing and is the most awesome
receiver I have ever operated.
This receiver is what sold me on the Jupiter and by the way the Jupiter
receiver holds it's own with the NRD-545.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Moreschi" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "tentec" <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: [TenTec] DSP filtering Negative Feelings
> I am confused at all the negative feelings I see posted about DSP
> In all my years hamming using collins mechanical filters, multipole
> filters and the like, I have never seen anything as good as state of the
> filters. The filters in my RX-340 are and my son's 756PRO are sharper by
> an order of magnitude than anything else I have ever seen. They have no
> and almost perfectly square shape factors.
> I have a feeling that most of the people knocking them do not own them.
> me a good DSP filter design over a lot of crystal or mechanical filters
> The DSP costs much less, and you usually get 30 to 50 filters. Compare
> to one filter costing $100 to $200.
> Even the addition of an outboard audio DSP unit usually makes a non-DSP
> much better.
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> Franklinton, North Carolina
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
> Submissions: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: email@example.com
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com