[TenTec] Kachina discontinued

J. Duffy Beischel duffyb01@fuse.net
Wed, 16 May 2001 23:10:04 -0400


Folks,

It is called competition.  If they make a product hams want, hams will buy
it.  Ten Tec produced a good product that competed directly with the Kachina
product.  The difference was that is was substantially less expensive.  One
can argue that the Kachina was better (I don't know just for the sake of
argument), but the Ten Tec product is very good and people seem to like it -
and it is a lot less money.

The number of hams continues to grow.  People will buy the radios if the
manufacturers make a radio hams want.  Look at the Yaesu FT-817 portable -
it is blowing off the shelves.  Why is the Ten Tec line popular?  Well they
are just easier to operate.  When will the Japanese learn that I don't want
to have to carry a book to remember how to operate the radio.  Too many
menus and buttons and features that Joe Sixpack ham just doesn't use.  All I
keep seeing are more of the same radios that are more complicated to
operate.

Build a better mouse trap, at a lower cost and people will buy it.

IMHO

Duffy - WB8NUT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Newell" <MNEWELL1@austin.rr.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Kachina discontinued


>
> And if this can happen to Kachina, it can happen to others. In
> my mind, this simply takes away one option that folks could have, and
> that's not a good thing.
>
> 73,
>
> Mike - WB4HUC
> Austin, TX
> http://wb4huc.home.texas.net
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ken Kinyon - W7TS <W7TS@Qwest.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 6:29 PM
> Subject: RE: [TenTec] Kachina discontinued
>
>
> >
> > Part of my point is that I don't feel that someone who apparently makes
a
> > living selling Ham Gear, etc. should be posting to the reflectors as
> though
> > they were just another Ham and then appending ham related ads to the
> bottom
> > of their message.  Especially when commenting on other Manufacturers.
> > 73,
> > Ken
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
> Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
>
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com