[TenTec] More About Clix

[n4lq at iglou.com]

The "digital" sound is sometimes hard to detect to the untrained ear. It 
seems to show up best during either deep fades when phase distortion 
enhances it or when the signal is very strong. Switching back and forth 
between a normal cw carrier and the Peg, one can detect the difference. 
I'm convinced that most people just write it off to band conditions. 
As for getting on-the-air reports, generally, they are worthless. There's 
only a few operators who will critique a signal and give a critical 
report. 

Considering your QTH Jim, I doubt if anyone would ever notice the fuzzy 
sound much less report it! After all, they want that QSL OM. 



-----Original Message-----
From: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid at verizon.net>
To: "Paul Christensen" <paulc at mediaone.net>, 
<tentec at contesting.com>, "Carl Moreschi" <n4py at earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:53:27 -1000
Subject: Re: [TenTec]  More About Clix

> Hi,
> 
> Per the ARRL test of the Pegasus,  Feb. 2000 QST,  it appears
> that both the rise and fall time of the CW keying is somewhere
> near 2.5 or 3 mSec,  up and down.  Have looked through the
> Pegasus.doc of the N4PY software,  and find no way to adjust
> the envelope;  is this true,  what the ARRL shows is what we
> get?  Be fun to adjust if possible to repeat some of the experiences
> being reported in this thread.
> 
> Note:  no one yet has said that my Pegasus CW note sounds
> "digital",  hi.  Say it sounds "just fine".
> 
> 73,  Jim  KH7M
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>