[TenTec] RX-350 Vs Omni VI Plus

[gr1ns@aol.com]

In a message dated 1/6/02 11:20:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
paulc@mediaone.net writes:

> The RX-340 is superior to the Omni Six on the ham bands...period.  The
>  RX-340 is seemingly impossible to overload, the zero-overshoot DSP filter
>  skirts are surgically precise, and 50+ DSP filter bandwidths can be
>  selected.  Under no conditions during the past six months has the Omni
>  outperformed the RX-340 under and operating condition.  Carl, N4PY has more
>  direct experience in contesting conditions, but in weak-signal DX work, the
>  RX-340 is unbeatable.


Okay, fair enough, I would hope with that kind of price difference the 340 
would be superior to the Omni VI Plus.  But how about a comparison for 
receive between the RX-350 and the Omni VI Plus?  

I do more listening than transmitting these days, and in fact do own an Omni 
VI Plus and am looking seriously at the RX-350 for short-wave listening.  
Currently I use a Sony ICF-2010 with the KIWA filters.   I really want the 
340 but I just can not justify the cash, plus size is a factor where I want 
to place it.

Comments anyone?  How is the AM Sync on the RX-350?

Thanks,

Michael, K5AWI