[TenTec] eham centurion 0 review

[Steve M]

Who decided that the review writer had a "reputation for excessively
negative opinions"? It could be said as a counterpoint that your opinion of
the reviewer is "excessively negative".

    Just another ham's opinion.

73
Steve  wd0ct

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review


> Again, pending a reply from the eHam Review Sections Editor(s), let's not
> jump to conclusions as to WHY the aforementioned review was moved.
>
> We've already had a couple of implications that this was done for various
> nefarious reasons, which have given some an excuse to blast TenTec for
> "forcing" the move, when it turns out they had nothing to do with it.
>
> Given the reputation of the review writer for excessively negative
opinions,
> it is very possible that the editors decided on their own after review
> (what, you think they don't review these things before or after they're
> posted?) that the move was justified based on the merits of the article
> itself as it was written.
>
> In other words, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.  Sheesh.
>
> And to those who automatically assume the worst, let me remind you of this
> little ditty, which I'm probably misquoting a touch:
>
> "Some would see this glass as half empty.
> Some would see this glass as half full.
> Me, Woody, I see a need for a refill.  Another beer?"  -- Norm, Cheers
> (attributed)
>
> 73, ron wn3vaw
>
> "And they give you cash,
> which is just as good as money!"
> Yogi Berra, AFLAC Commercial, 2002
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec