[TenTec] DSP reports--suggestion/request

Bill KB9IV wmarvin at hickorytech.net
Tue Apr 29 10:09:16 EDT 2003


Rob,

For the most part it shines on CW, mediocre on SSB.

73 Bill KB9IV


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj at hotmail.com>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: [TenTec] DSP reports--suggestion/request


>
> Hi everyone:
>
> When giving a report on DSP quality for a particular rig, it would be a
big
> help if everyone would say the mode being used to base the report on.  To
be
> honest, I have tried the DSP on my Omni VI/3 on sideband and been
> disappointed, preferring to use my 1.8 khz filter in the 6 mhz IF and PBT.
> (My optional filter lineup is 250, 500, 1800 at 6 and 250 and 1800 at 9.
I
> almost never need the 9 mhz filters.  All of mine are TTs.)  So when I
hear
> that the Omni DSP is better than the Jup's I'm really surprised since the
> Jup came along later and one assumes the technology advanced along the
way.
> My guess is you're all on CW or my DSP is defective but I have no way of
> knowing if you leave out the mode.
>
> Tnx & 73,
>
> Rob Atkinson
> K5UJ
> k5uj at hotmail.com
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>




More information about the TenTec mailing list