[TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion
Paul Christensen, Esq.
w9ac at arrl.net
Sat Dec 13 07:34:52 EST 2003
Anyone know if the League has documented and disclosed its step-by-step
Product Review testing methods and procedures? Specifically, is each
measuring instrument calibrated against a traceable standard before each
product evaluation?
And, what assurance and validation process takes place to ensure that their
results are accurate? At a minimum, I would hope that their test results
are repeated, and conducted by alternate personnel to validate the
procedure, notwithstanding test equipment measuring error.
-Paul, W9AC
----- Original Message -----
From: <K8bvj at aol.com>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion
> In a message dated 12/13/2003 7:08:16 AM Eastern Standard Time,
s56a at bit.si
> writes:
>
> >
> > W4ZV>
> > Radio BDR at 20kHz BDR at 5kHz BDR at 1kHz
> > K2 136 126 TBD
> > Orion 129 130 TBD
> > FT-1000MP 142 119 TBD
> >
> > We often check $$$ numbers for price/performance ratio in poorer
countries!
> >
> > It was mentioned here only in IC-7800 case
>
> It's amazing how you fellas compare the Orion or even the Jupiter to a K2
rig
> or even some of those Jap rigs.
>
> Enjoy your American made rig and the super tech support from Ten Tec.
> Forget the numbers, it's the real world experience that counts.
>
> Jack
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
More information about the TenTec
mailing list