[TenTec] Re: PTT and CW and Amps...

Rick Westerman Rick at dj0ip.de
Mon Dec 29 00:55:52 EST 2003


Do what you have to do, Keith!

HNY
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Keith Lodahl
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 12:40 AM
To: Rick at dj0ip.de; tentec at contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Re: PTT and CW and Amps...

There are far to many issues that are important enough for a
couple of you
to send hundreds of posts over a few days.  I hope you enjoy the
space I
will be leaving you.

73

Keith Lodahl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Rick
Westerman
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 5:28 PM
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [TenTec] Re: PTT and CW and Amps...
>
>
> Sri John, you're wrong.
>
> I too have been using Ten-Tec (since 1974) and love it as much
as
> any other man or woman on this planet.
>
> We have a point that is very important to some of the guys here
> and totally unimportant to many (maybe most) others.
> If it is not important to you, don't read the posts.
> To those of us to whom it is important, we won't give it a rest
> until it is settled to our satisfaction.
> John, we ARE discussing something constructive - even if you do
> not currently understand why.
> Sorry, John, but at the end of the day, TEN-TEC will benefit
from
> this.
>
> Vy 73 es HNY
> Rick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of John T.
> Fleming
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:46 PM
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [TenTec] Re: PTT and CW and Amps...
>
> I have been using Ten-Tec rigs since 1975 when I started with a
> Triton II.
> That rig and all of my Ten-Tec rigs since then have been QSK.
At
> the time,
> the competitors came out with a similar keying but none were
QSK
> like the
> Ten-Tec.  My Triton II had VOX and PTT for SSB.  Is this
> something "brand
> new" after almost 30 years?  Let's move onto something
> constructive!  We
> have wasted enough bytes!!!
>
> 73,
> John
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




More information about the TenTec mailing list