[TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive

[Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX]

Tim:

Actually the opposite.  The Paragon uses several PLL's but the Omni VI+ is
crystal mixing.  It has the lowest noise of any of them.  The DSP does a
wonderful job of noise reduction and killing heterodynes.  It does
contribute to somewhat of a "digital" sound in the receive audio.  The
Paragon, being all analog, give a nice warm sound.

In my book, I don't find any radio any better, for any price than the Omni
VI+.

73
Bob, K4TAX

----- Original Message -----
From: <tlogan7 at cox.net>
To: "tentec reflector" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:19 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive


> One of my thoughts in giving a Corsair II a trial run was that it did not
> have DSP or a PLL and was almost a 1/3 less in cost than a used Omni VI+.
I
> had the impresseion that some people's experience with noise from the PLL
> and DSP was a negative in the Omni VI+, while the added features of dual
> VFO's (w/o having an external module), memories etc, made up for that
> internal noise. I know on paper what it says, but many of you may have
> graduated from a Corsair II to an Omni VI+ - which, who knows, maybe I
will
> too - so I would be interested to know if  any of you VI+ owners even
> remotely missed the Corsair because of the above items. I suspect not, but
I
> am curious. 73/Tim NZ7C
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>