[TenTec] FCC Letters for "Enhanced SSB

Keith Lodahl lodahlkh at charter.net
Tue May 27 19:50:14 EDT 2003


Tonight it will be a Navy MARS net for Wisconsin traffic.

Keith Lodahl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Mark Erbaugh
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 6:45 PM
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] FCC Letters for "Enhanced SSB
>
>
> Keith,
>
> What net?
>
> 73,
> Mark
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Keith Lodahl" <lodahlkh at charter.net>
> To: <bstephens1 at mindspring.com>; <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 19:25 PM
> Subject: RE: [TenTec] FCC Letters for "Enhanced SSB
>
>
> > When I retracted my previous comments I aknowledged a similar
> fact.  When
> I
> > got my Jupiter it was set for 3.9K I cut it back a bunch and then found
> out
> > that most of the stations I talk with can't tell the difference.  After
> > reading this post completely I trimmed it back some more.  I
> wonder what I
> > will hear tonight on the net?
> >
> > Keith Lodahl
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
> > > [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of ROBERT STEPHENS
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:28 PM
> > > To: tentec at contesting.com
> > > Subject: RE: [TenTec] FCC Letters for "Enhanced SSB
> > >
> > >
> > > Actually,oddly enough, it is  of  some relevance to the Ten Tec
> reflector.
> > > Some of the favorite rigs of the Enhanced SSB folks include Ten Tec
> > > Corsairs, Omni V,Omni VI, Jupiter, and undoubtedly soon, the Orient. I
> do
> > > not do enhanced ultra wide ssb myself, but I do like the
> audio that the
> > > unmodified Corsair is capable of.
> > > 73
> > > Bob KB1CIW
> > >
> > >
> > > > [Original Message]
> > > > From: Keith Lodahl <lodahlkh at charter.net>
> > > >
> > > > Subject: RE: [TenTec] FCC Letters for "Enhanced SSB
> > > >
> > > > I understand the implications of this to our hobby, and I understand
> the
> > > > frustration of those involved, but what makes this an issue for
> > > this list?
> > > > I read about this on the general lists, and on QRZ, also hear
> > > about it on
> > > > the air.  I don't see what makes it on topic for the Ten
> Tec list.  I
> > > would
> > > > think it is rather fully covered elsewhere.
> > > >
> > > > Keith Lodahl
> > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec at contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>




More information about the TenTec mailing list