[TenTec] Re: Opinions on vertical

Stuart Rohre rohre at arlut.utexas.edu
Thu Oct 16 19:25:47 EDT 2003


Rob, I agree that I should qualify my statements about radials and the
vertical Dipole to the bands where the Titan is near full size, 20 m and up.
Since I mainly operate 20m, it was a huge improvement over conventional Hy
Gain quarter wave trapped vertical.

For 20m and up, the 40m element of the Titan provides a type of counterpoise
as compared to 20m results with a low G5RV.  IE, my DX is better on the
asymmetric vertical dipole.

40m has been mostly used for stateside contacts; although there have been
some check ins to Pacific DX nets.   That performance definitely depends on
the sun spot cycles, and was done on the rising portion of the last cycle.
I have been entirely happy with 40m use on SSB nets as well.

80m has been used for net check ins, and being a vertical and small (25
feet) for this band, the performance is about what you would expect when you
are cross polarized from the majority on the SSB portion of the band.  I do
get around the state at 50 to 100 watts.  It hears very well on 80m, and is
definitely quieter than shorter quarter wave bottom fed verticals I have
tried.

Stuart
K5KVH

For an all band antenna, The Titan has been an adequate solution.   However,
I do advocate horizontal antennas and a combination of antennas both low and
higher to do both NVIS on low bands and conventional horizontally polarized
operations for any ham.  The main limit here has been time and storms that
keep taking down trees and horizontal antennas hung in them; while the Titan
sways and rides out the blow.




More information about the TenTec mailing list