[TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin'

[Richard Donovan]

     I've just never been a big Scout fan, Ron.  I think TT can do better
than that.  If they want to call it a Scout II, that's fine, but they need
something to compete with the mobile rigs like Yaesu and Icom have.  Rich

- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw at verizon.net>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin'


> Bring back the Scout?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Donovan" <n5xm at alltel.net>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:47 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] Tennessee Dreamin'
>
>
> >       I was working a fellow TT owner on CW on 20m this afternoon, and
our
> > conversation led to the interesting question of "what rigs would you
like
> to
> > see TT bring out for their loyal users?"  I would like a series of 100W
> > CW-only radios, each for one band only.  As the TT habit is one that
lasts
> a
> > lifetime, in ten years, at say, 800.00 a pop, you could eventually end
up
> > with an incredible shack.  They could even make SSB only individual band
> > rigs for those of us who like microphones (!?), and we could mix and
match
> > for whatever kind of setup we wanted.
> >       I would also like to see a 100W TT mobile rig.  That way, I could
> > learn to do mobile CW...as it is, I sure hate the thought of having to
> spend
> > good money on a non-TT rig.  If you could ask TT to do put out a new
rig,
> > what would it be?
> >       I sure learn a lot from all you super intelligent mavens here.
I'm
> > good on theory, but prefer to be a simple, very active CW op.  Any
> thoughts
> > from you good folks?  Rich, n5xm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>