AW: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here?

[Carsten Esch]

... is it that difficult to use the DEL key on those messages you are not
interested in? Not for me at least ...

Carsten, DL6LAU

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]Im Auftrag von Don Watters
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. August 2004 17:53
An: Jim Brown; tentec at contesting.com
Betreff: Re: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here?


Jim Brown -

I agree, why not keep Ten-Tec in the Ten-Tec forum and let
those who wish to comment on the JA rig go to the ICOM forum?

73 -  Don,  VE1BN at eastlink.ca
----- Original Message -----


From: "Jim Brown" <jim at audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here?


> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:53:23 -0700, NJ0IP wrote:
>
> >The 7800 review in RadCom came
> >out just a few days ago so it's currently a hot toppic.
>
> I repeat the question -- why is this being discussed at such great on the
> TenTec list?  Isn't this list devoted to the operation, use, and
maintenance of
> TenTec gear?
>
> Is it because some of our members are more intereted in "cheerleading" or
> taking sides in a "mine is better than yours" (or "mine is bigger than
yours")
> playground fight?
>
> Jim Brown  K9YC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec