[TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment

[n4lq]

Possibly but it would be difficult to get the RF gain of both rigs set 
the same. There are probably many ways of comparing rigs that the ARRL 
never though of. My point here is to demonstrate that sometimes the 
ability of a receiver to provide good readability of a signal is more 
dependant on actual on-the-air operation instead of static measurements 
with expensive test equipment. All I'm doing is feeding a typical signal 
into the radio and measuring what comes forth from the speaker.
I have some more ideas I'll pass along later after I get a chance to try 
them.
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e at comcast.net>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:43:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment

> Would it be a better test to turn the AGC's off??
> ...Dave
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a at bit.si>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 6:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment
> 
> 
> > N4LQ> the fact that those products were LOUDER on the PRO than they
> were
> on
> > the Omni tells me something. Question is: What did it tell me?
> >
> > PRO has very fast AGC attack in order to prevent DSP ADC overflow. 
> It
> also
> > recovers more RX gain between dot pauses and therefore signal sounds
> louder.
> >
> > In order to prevent this happening, I use slow AGC on FT-1000MP
> without
> DSP
> > detection and filtering in CW contesting.
> > I might lose some weak signals between the strong ones but the CW
> rate is
> > higher due to complete stronger callsigns acquisition.
> > The beauty of RTTY is that confusing random noise influence is
> greatly
> > reduced.  Others enjoy in QSK :-)
> >
> > 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>