[TenTec] The QSK of QSK

[Tommy]

Bob....

I did not receive the wav files. Sure would appreciate it if you  would send
them  again to aldermant at alltel.net

Thanks.

Tom - W4BQF

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Henderson" <bob at cytanet.com.cy>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK


> Tom
>
> Yes I monitored rf output with a seperate receiver.  I've sent you two
.wav
> files of what my Orion produces at 60 wpm.
>
> Bob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tommy" <aldermant at alltel.net>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
>
>
> > Since you are a very astute ham Bob, I will just assume you did that
while
> > listening to your Orion on a different receiver. The Orion's sidetone
> works
> > OK at 70 wpm, but the two Orions I have certainly will not send
correctly
> > timed/spaced CW over about 50 wpm. No one that  I have sent CW at speeds
> > over 50 wpm can copy it because the timing is so messed up. And it is
not
> my
> > PC or DGM keyboard since I have  asked two fellow hams to try  their
> Orions
> > at 50 and 60 wpm, with the same results.
> >
> > I agree, I don't know anyone, except a few German hams, who send at 70
wpm
> > with a keyer.
> >
> > Tom - W4BQF
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bob Henderson" <bob at cytanet.com.cy>
> > To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:06 AM
> > Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> >
> >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > You have me confused now for sure!
> > >
> > > When you say you "can work around" the QSK switching issue, does that
> mean
> > > by not bothering with QSK or do you have a cunning work around that
> hasn't
> > > occurred to me?
> > >
> > > I have just run my Orion at 70 wpm for half an hour and I don't hear
> > > anything wrong with the code sent.  Incidentally, I did not use the
> > internal
> > > keyer.
> > >
> > > Bob, 5B4AGN
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tommy" <aldermant at alltel.net>
> > > To: "Jim Brown" <jim at audiosystemsgroup.com>; <tentec at contesting.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:02 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > >
> > >
> > > > I don't have an issue with the QSK switching, one can work around
> that.
> > > What
> > > > I have an issue with is that most radios I have operated, that
employ
> > > > digital techniques, do not send CW correctly at speed over 40 wpm.
> > > > Especially Ten Tec radios.
> > > >
> > > > Tom - W4BQF
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I do it differently -- that is, I try to use radios that give me
the
> > > > maximum
> > > > > time between dits to listen. And part of what I think W4BQF is
> > > > > complaining about with high speed CW may be that some radios just
> > > > > don't switch fast enough.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jim  K9YC
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > TenTec at contesting.com
> > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > TenTec at contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec at contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec