[TenTec] Centurian 422 vs Titan III
NJ0IP
Rick at DJ0IP.de
Sun Dec 19 17:44:34 EST 2004
Hank,
I don't like amps which use tubes that require safety protection circuitry.
This is not a Ten-Tec issue but rather a tube selection issue.
Use a pair of 3-500's and keep an eye on the grid current and it will run
forever!
73
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of HENRY PFIZENMAYER
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 9:33 AM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Centurian 422 vs Titan III
Like to hear some opinions on the new Centurian versus the Titan III . If I
am gonna order the Centurian , I want to do it this week.
1. 1000-1200 watts versus 1500 watts is not an issue for me .
2. QSK life is not an issue , I will operate "semi-breakin" with the amp.
3. Spits and arcs are a big issue.
4. Looks like tube replacement cost are close enough to be a toss up.
5. 99 percent of operation will be CW.
6. While cost is not a complete non-issue , my last amp ran for
25 years and I expect the same with this one, at which point
I won't care anymore !!!!
7. Have an Orion on order and expect to use the amp with Orion
to keep it all Tentec.
8. Reliability -Reliability - Reliability is a major issue.
9. 160 is a must.
I have read all the reviews I can find , looked at archives until
my neck hurts and still have not reached a decision. One thing
that continues to pop out at me is the number of Centurians
for sale used - always wonder why - surely 1000 vs 1500 watts
is not the issue.
Any thoughts ?
off line is fine to hanknospam at att.net
Thanks - Hank K7HP
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
More information about the TenTec
mailing list