[TenTec] v1369 ??

[Adam Farson]

Tom,

Canada has had regulations specifying maximum occupied bandwidth by band,
rather than band segmentation by emission and licence grade, for as long as
I can remember - and the Canadian ham community has no problem with it that
I know of. We do not have very much freebander encroachment either - when
they are caught, if they are on Canadian soil, they go to prison and lose
all their equipment.

Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Tommy
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 07:23
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] v1369 ??


Yep...that's certainly true! Just wait until it becomes more widely know
that  the ARRL is going to propose ham band restructuring based on mode
bandwidth.They will eventually succeed in giving this hobby to the
free-banders under the false assumption it will increase they bank
account(s).

Tom/W4BQF


----- Original Message -----
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t at comcast.net>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] v1369 ??


> Note that I didn't say there weren't any issues ... just that it's always
good
> to have SOMETHING to grumble about ..... think how boring this list
> would be without that .... :-)
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec