[TenTec] Re: An example of changing Orion firmware to meetexpectationsof

Les Peters, N1SV n1sv at comcast.net
Fri Jul 9 19:51:52 EDT 2004


Sorry I just forwarded the message from the YCCC reflector I don't have 
any additional information.

Ron Martin wrote:

> Please read Barry's text, second to last paragraph.  I answered a 
> question ....
>
> Please read my response, first line, Duane.  I agreed with Barry's point.
> Being an engineering manager, one of the points that I have learned in 
> this business is to make requirements as clear as possible......  
> Actually, I would like to have the choice of just transferring 
> frequency and mode included.  So, everyone can not be satisfied all 
> the time......
> Have a Good Day Duane.
>
> Ron......NU1U
> Duane A Calvin writes:
>
>> Barry's point, if you re-read his note, is to allow the user to select
>> whether he wants all the information transferred to the subRX or 
>> not.  In
>> other words, you get to choose how it works.  I'm sure you don't object
>> to that since you can have it the way you want - - until next week when
>> you decide you could use it the other way, then you still get it the way
>> you want!  Win-win solution.
>>         73,  Duane
>>
>> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 19:41:12 GMT Ron Martin <royalct at inr.net> writes:
>>
>>> You got it Barry,
>>> Also, I do object for all the reciever modes/setup/whatever being 
>>> transferred to the sub receiver.  I want to set up my sub receiver 
>>> the way I want and only have its frequency change when I push the 
>>> A>B button. 
>>>  
>>>
>>> Ron....NU1U 
>>>  
>>> Barry N1EU writes: 
>>> > NU1U opined: "This only drives the point that what is
>>> > transferred to the Orions's subreceiver should be user
>>> > selectable. All I want to transfer to the subreceiver
>>> > is the frequency and maybe the mode." > > Since the Orion is NOT 
>>> endowed with unlimited memory
>>> > space, I would think there are memory constraints to
>>> > consider in storing more user configurable option
>>> > pipedreams. > > So let me get this straight.  You'd actually 
>>> object to
>>> > bandwith and AGC being transferred along with mode? > You prefer 
>>> to end up with 500hz/fastAGC in USB (if
>>> > your subreceiver had been previously set for cw) or
>>> > 2.4KHz/slowAGC in cw (if your subreceiver had been
>>> > previously set for SSB)? > > If you need to give some user 
>>> configuation, I think a
>>> > simple yes/no suffices: when I push A-->B, either
>>> > leave my subreceiver alone (No) or make my subreceiver
>>> > mode/BW/AGC/PBT/whatever just like my main receiver
>>> > (Yes). > > 73,
>>> > Barry N1EU > > >                 > __________________________________
>>> > Do you Yahoo!?
>>> > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
>>> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > TenTec mailing list
>>> > TenTec at contesting.com
>>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>  
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>  
>>
>> Duane Calvin, AC5AA
>> Austin, Texas
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>




More information about the TenTec mailing list