[TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out
Bill Tippett
btippett at alum.mit.edu
Tue May 4 09:29:47 EDT 2004
K4IA wrote:
>Why does ARRL and the FCC keep focusing on local interference? My town
probably won't ever have BPL but I sure as heck will be able to hear it
from other
areas.
Excellent point! I have not read ARRL's document but am surprised
they would not mention this. When I can hear a 20 uW signal on 160 from
275 miles away, and 100 mW on 10 meters from Europe, why would I not
expect to hear the accumulated noise of thousands of BPL sources from
a skip zone with propagation? Seems to me like it would simply raise the
noise floor when that happened. This might be worth mentioning as a Reply
Comment which is now possible even if you did not comment in the original
Comment period.
73, Bill W4ZV
More information about the TenTec
mailing list