[TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range

Jim Brown jim at audiosystemsgroup.com
Sat Sep 4 15:55:08 EDT 2004


On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:34:55 -0500, Jim Brown wrote:

One point I forgot to address. The K2 is not as easy to operate as the Omni or 746 
families. The original post correctly noted, for example, that the DSP system scores 
very poorly for user-friendliness. It isn't easy to use if you know how to use it. 

BUT: the DSP works so well that you can set it and forget it. Also, it is so versatile that 
has settings that match all operating conditions very well. So an operator who 
understands how to use it simply chooses the appropriate settings and they don't need 
to be changed.  

On Field Day, a good operator needs only a few controls -- the tuning knob, the crystal 
filter switch, RIT, gain controls, and maybe the speed key for the keyer.  And, of course, 
he/she needs to know how to change bands and load the antennas (which ought to be 
resonant). All of these are VERY simple on the K2, just as they are on the Omni series. 
Anything else that he/she is trying to change probably shouldn't be changed if it was set 
up correctly to begin with! 

One other point. A study of ARRL test reports on receiver performance and transmitter 
cleanliness will quickly reveal that the Jupiter is simply NOT in the same class with the 
Omni V and later radios.  Neither is the 746 or 746 Pro. 


Jim Brown  K9YC




More information about the TenTec mailing list