[TenTec]software vs. hdw. etc.

[Steve N4LQ]

Dave: Are you saying that software programing replaces parts? Even if we 
wanted to program these things, we couldn't because we don't have the source 
code. They are making radios that hams cannot even experiment with.

Steve N4LQ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned at centurytel.net>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector


> Well, now
>    In the early days of ham radio we learned to build 'hardware' receivers
> and transmitters from scratch - why not learn to program software defined
> radios from scratch?  Then we wouldn't have to go 'crying to mama'!   It's 
> a
> lot easier than unsoldering and re-soldering!
>
>   What was that term that was first used back then?  Appliance operators?
>
> Dave K5WNV
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq at iglou.com>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 6:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector
>
>
>> "For me, the hardware changes mean nothing. Its the receiver that counts"
>>
>> Now there's a good one. Let's see.....I explain how the changes to the
> ICOM
>> Pro line are not software changes and am blamed for "bashing TenTec"! 
>> Then
>> I'm told that receivers are not hardware.
>>
>> Well let me say this about software. You could have a very good radio 
>> with
>> NO software but a radio that was ALL software wouldn't work AT ALL. So if
> I
>> am "bashing" something, it is software. Software reduces us to something
>> even worse than appliance operators. It turns us in to helpless 
>> sucklings,
>> always looking to mama programmer for more firmware milk. It appears that
>> SOME of our rigs are having problems being weaned, yea even what is
> claimed
>> to be the "Highest Performance, Optimized" transceiver is still crying 
>> for
>> mama.
>>
>> "Mama mama, my QSK is clicking and my screen is brown"
>> Ohhhh mama, I am loosing my audio and my output is down.
>> Pleassssseeee mama help me before I lock up and totally shut down!"
>>
>>
>> Steve N4LQ
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu at hotmail.com>
>> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 6:11 AM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Now Steve, just because you like to bash Ten Tec, give the new guy a
>> > break, he likes his radio.
>> >
>> > For me, the hardware changes mean nothing. Its the receiver that 
>> > counts.
>> > You can have the PRO line and anything the other two make also.
>> >
>> > The Flex Radio is closer to being a SDR than anything else and may be
> the
>> > next move here.
>> >
>> > 73  Bill  kc4atu
>> > QRP, doing more with less
>> > FM19ga
>> >
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
>> > http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > TenTec mailing list
>> > TenTec at contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>